free webpage hit counter

Former Trump Attorney Who Advised Him Over Jan 6 Incident Facing Disbarment and Indictment

by Jessica

Prominent attorney John Eastman, known for his involvement in advising former President Donald Trump during the turbulent aftermath of the 2020 election, is seeking a delay in his disbarment proceedings in California as per reports by Politico on August 7.

Eastman’s legal team recently submitted an appeal to the court, expressing heightened concerns that he might face criminal charges as part of the ongoing investigation led by special counsel Jack Smith.

Eastman’s lawyers, Randall Miller and Zachary Mayer detailed their client’s growing unease about potential criminal charges in a filing on August 4.

This development has led Eastman to contemplate invoking his Fifth Amendment rights during the disbarment proceedings.

The Fifth Amendment provides individuals with the ability to decline offering testimony that could incriminate them.

However, choosing this route during the disbarment proceedings could jeopardize Eastman’s defense of his law license.

In the filing, Miller and Mayer requested that the court exercise its discretion to postpone the State Bar’s disciplinary proceedings until the resolution of the parallel criminal investigation conducted by Special Counsel Jack Smith.

Eastman’s attorneys underscored the delicate balance he faces between defending his legal career and preserving his constitutional right against self-incrimination.

Eastman faces disciplinary charges related to alleged violations of professional ethics, rules, and even laws in connection with his role in attempting to overturn the certified results of the 2020 election.

The trial initially began in June, with Eastman testifying for several hours before the proceedings were postponed due to their extended duration.

Eastman’s request for a postponement hinges on the outcome of Smith’s recently filed criminal case, which so far lists Trump as the sole defendant.

If Eastman’s request is denied, he has additionally asked for a three-month delay to assess whether he faces criminal charges by that point.

Identified as “co-conspirator 2” in Smith’s indictment, Eastman played a pivotal role in the allegations brought forward.

The indictment alleges that Eastman employed misleading arguments based on unfounded claims of election fraud to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence into obstructing the election of Joe Biden.

The case highlights the intricate legal dilemmas posed by parallel criminal and civil proceedings.

Eastman’s situation raises questions about how individuals facing such circumstances must navigate their constitutional rights while protecting their interests in both arenas.

As the legal process unfolds, the outcome of Eastman’s appeal for a postponement will significantly impact his ability to defend his law license and potentially influence the broader legal landscape.

The intersection of criminal and civil proceedings underscores the complex challenges that legal professionals, defendants, and the justice system face in ensuring a fair and just legal process.

Related Posts