free webpage hit counter

“It is Not Possible This Judge Can be Fair” Trump Spells Doom For Himself in His Fraud Case

by Jessica

Former President Donald Trump launched a scathing tirade on social media, accusing the New York legal system of corruption and asserting that he is ensnared in a web of Democratic malfeasance.

In his post on Truth Social on Thursday, October 5, Trump vehemently contested the valuation of his properties and criticized Attorney General Letitia James, whom he labeled as “CORRUPT, RACIST, & INCOMPETENT.”

Trump’s frustration with the lawsuit filed against him is palpable. He contends that the facts and valuations presented in the case are fundamentally flawed, citing an egregious example of Mar-a-Lago being appraised at $18 million, a fraction of its perceived worth.

He further alleges that the lawsuit is a politically motivated sham and decries the absence of a jury trial, a situation he believes favors a biased, left-leaning judge.

The former President’s language is charged with accusations of corruption and political bias within the New York legal system.

He asserts that a ‘radical left’ judge, Arthur F. Engoron, whom he claims rose through the ranks of the Democratic Club System, is presiding over the case, raising doubts about the judge’s ability to impartially adjudicate.

Trump’s allegations extend to Attorney General Letitia James, whom he accuses of deliberately steering the case away from the respected “Commercial Division,” which he argues would be better equipped to handle matters of valuation and real estate.

“It is not possible that he can be fair. Every decision he makes has been a horror show. It is why I do the set-asides with the media – To explain the case, and what is going on,” Trump said in part.

In Trump’s view, this move demonstrates James’ political agenda and a lack of understanding regarding the intricacies of the case.

The former President’s assertion that the Appellant Division must intercede adds an additional layer of complexity to an already contentious legal battle.

It reflects a deep skepticism of the current proceedings and a belief that a higher authority must step in to rectify what Trump perceives as a fundamentally flawed process.

This public statement provides a revealing glimpse into the intense emotions and high stakes surrounding Trump’s legal predicament.

It illustrates a deeply polarized and contentious situation, with the former President vehemently asserting his innocence and criticizing what he perceives as a biased and unfair legal process.

As the case continues to unfold, it remains a focal point of national attention, encapsulating the broader political and legal dynamics at play in the United States.

Related Posts