Deatails On Why Trump Was Blocked From Buying A Gun With His Face On It Despite Declaring Interest

by Jessica

Former President Donald Trump has found himself in the midst of controversy yet again, this time over his supposed desire to purchase a Glock handgun.

According to a report by HuffPost on Tuesday, September 26, 2023, while initial reports suggested that Trump had indeed acquired the firearm, subsequent updates and legal analysis have shed light on the potential legal violations associated with such a purchase.

The saga began when MSNBC shared a video of Trump proudly displaying a Glock handgun adorned with his own image during a rally in South Carolina. In this video, Trump boldly declared his intention to purchase the weapon.

However, the situation quickly escalated when a former spokesperson for the ex-president claimed that the Glock had already been purchased, sending shockwaves across the media landscape.

It’s important to note that as of the latest update, CNN reporter Alayna Treene has confirmed that Trump did not go through with the purchase of the firearm.

Former Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung has also deleted his social media post asserting that Trump had bought the Glock.

This development, while relieving for those concerned about potential legal violations, doesn’t entirely absolve the former president from scrutiny.

One of the key issues surrounding Trump’s purported firearm purchase is the possibility that he could have exploited the so-called “gun show loophole.”

This loophole refers to a gap in federal law that allows unlicensed private sellers to conduct firearm transactions without requiring background checks on buyers.

This unregulated space has raised concerns about the ease with which firearms can fall into the wrong hands.

United Against Gun Violence explains, “The ‘gun show loophole’ refers to the fact that federal law does not require unlicensed private sellers to perform background checks on gun purchasers, so those sales are unregulated unless state law steps in to fill the gap.”

While this loophole may have enabled some individuals to bypass background checks, it’s important to clarify that it remains a contentious issue within the broader gun control debate.

However, according to Reuters reporter Brad Heath, even if Trump had purchased the Glock, it could have constituted a violation of federal law.

Specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1) makes it a federal crime to sell a firearm to a person under felony indictment. Moreover, 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) deems it illegal for a person under indictment to ship or transport a firearm.

These statutes highlight the potential legal risks associated with Trump’s actions, as he is currently facing various legal challenges and investigations.

Former FBI general counsel Andrew Weissmann weighed in on the situation, suggesting that Trump may be daring the judges overseeing his cases to take action against him.

Under the law, Trump’s public declaration of his intent to purchase a firearm might be sufficient to raise concerns about his compliance with federal regulations, even if the purchase itself did not occur.

While the immediate panic surrounding Trump’s supposed Glock purchase has subsided with the revelation that the transaction did not happen, the incident has sparked discussions about the existing gaps in federal firearm regulations.

It also underscores the complex legal landscape that surrounds the former president and his interactions with the law.

As the legal drama continues to unfold, Trump’s statements and actions will undoubtedly remain under scrutiny from both his supporters and critics alike.

Related Posts