JUST IN: Joe Biden Blamed After Israel’s Deadly Terror Attack, Here is Why Blame is Put in Him

by Jessica

President Joe Biden is partly to blame for the deadly terror attack that was unleashed on Israel on Saturday, October 7, this is according to GOP Presidential Candidate Ron DeSantis.

The Florida Governor didn’t mince his words after he took to social media and squarely placed the blame for Israel’s terror attack on Iranian-backed Hamas militants at the feet of the Biden administration.

According to DeSantis, Iran’s financial support for this act of violence was facilitated by what he sees as lenient policies towards Iran adopted by the current U.S. government.

“Israel is now under attack by Iranian-backed Hamas terrorists. Iran has helped fund this war against Israel and Joe Biden’s policies that have gone easy on Iran have helped fill their coffers,” DeSantis declared in his post.

The accusation of indirect support for terrorism through lenient policies towards Iran is a serious charge. It raises concerns about the potential consequences of diplomatic decisions and the impact on international security.

DeSantis further outlined his stance on the matter, emphasizing his unwavering support for Israel in their efforts to combat terrorism.

He affirmed that the United States must stand firmly with Israel as they work to eradicate the threat posed by Hamas.

“We are going to stand with Israel as they root out Hamas and we need to stand up to Iran,” DeSantis concluded.

This strong statement reflects the broader debate over U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the context of the Middle East.

The delicate balance between diplomatic relations and national security interests is under intense scrutiny, as events in the region continue to unfold.

Critics of the Biden administration argue that a more assertive approach towards Iran is needed to prevent situations like the recent attack on Israel.

They contend that tougher policies may be required to curb Iran’s alleged support for extremist groups.


Conversely, proponents of a more diplomatic stance believe that engaging with Iran can lead to more stable and peaceful relations in the long term.

They argue that a cooperative approach has the potential to mitigate regional tensions.

As the situation evolves, it is clear that the Biden administration’s approach to Iran will remain a focal point of discussion.

The outcome of this debate will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for both the United States and its allies in the Middle East, particularly Israel.

In this high-stakes environment, the decisions made by world leaders will not only shape the immediate response to the crisis but also influence the broader trajectory of international relations in the region.

The challenge lies in finding a balance that addresses security concerns while preserving the potential for constructive dialogue and cooperation.

Related Posts